Operating software has to be efficient and fast not beautiful. As I told you the computers nowadays can handle big graphics that’s true but when you have the same computer with XP on it, it would be allot quicker!
A lot of people say that vista is the best operating software there is, but it’s not. Windows spend allot of time on useless gadget’s and graphics! OK computers nowadays can handle it but why? Why spend another gigabyte of RAM on graphics, when it can be used for other more useful stuff!
Operating software has to be efficient and fast not beautiful. As I told you the computers nowadays can handle big graphics that’s true but when you have the same computer with XP on it, it would be allot quicker!
Ever saw the minimal specifications on the back of a computer game?
that’s my proof that vista uses a lot of RAM:
when you read all the way down to the RAM part it says this: ‘RAM:1 GB Windows XP/ 2GB Windows Vista’. This means that XP can work with less than 1Gig (i guess it runs on a bit less than half of it) and can ever load other programs… Vista needs 1Gig or even more to work (my guess is about 1,5Gig: on a XP PC you can load other programs which use about 500MB of RAM, If it be same on a vista PC than that would mean this: 2-0.5=1.5 <– wow, that was difficult math, he he)!
Also never put vista on a old XP computer, It will be really slow. I’m not saying that XP is the best operating system: in my opinion all the Microsoft software sucks!
But hey! that my opinion…
Windows is the worst operating software there is: allot of bugs. Microsoft is focused on the money.
quantity not quality. It takes like 10 years to test operating software, but Microsoft releases software almost every four or fife years, they have no time to test it so they give out free beta software to users. They have to test the software, but the big downside of this is that not everything is tested!
The result is allot of trouble and allot of updates/patches… and the result of those patches cause other trouble… more patches… he he…
I’m a XP user, It works… But I still think apple did a better job! while Microsoft was still ******* with DOS (Disk operating software), apple already had a click-able interface and all that stuff… so windows is a bad copy of apple!
Strange that windows is the most used operating software there is?! It’s even standard software! WHY!!
My guess is money! Microsoft has allot of money so they can just buy their ’standard’.
OK that was my honest opinion about windows. hope you agree with me and If not, well…
Feel free to commend!
May 3rd, 2009 at 10:27 am
You spend a lot of timing slamming Microsoft but you do now that they have a working spelling a grammar checker… right?
“allot”
“useless gadget’s”
“that my opinion”
“Ever saw the minimal specifications”
May 5th, 2009 at 1:55 am
Yep you\’re right: I do know they have a spelling checker, but I wouldn\’t say it is a working one; in the end you have to choose between two or more options. I\’m not even talking about a grammar checker! This can never work out… software just cant see something like this only human beings can!
If you\’re the master of the obvious you should know this:
In my main language we have an idiom: \”De pot verwijt de ketel\”
It means that you should lecture someone on something you do yourself:
Try using \’time\’ instead of \’timing\’.
When you use \’but\’ there has to be a \”,\” before it: \’,but\’.
you were so hasty to lecture me, that you couldn\’t even finish some words:
now = know
a = and
also when a sentence is over: (when these \’,.!?\’ are used
the next letter is a kapital letter–> Right?
So don\’t give me this, don\’t comment just because you want to comment: I want to see you\’re opinion: if you like the article or not and why…
Still, I will try to fix this: you\’re totally right about the spelling: it sucks.
That\’s all I wanted to say.
May 5th, 2009 at 1:57 am
?? what happened with my comment ??